+9999999 can’t avoid scav all the time
+1
but there is an anticheat which automatically kicks cheater . With this command player can kick hacker or cheater manually but they will join again so this command is not very helpful
To support this idea,
there must be a ban command which bans a player for 5 to 10 minutes or more
as developer decide, so they can't join again
I've suggested something similar before, +1
For that, Roles should be added. You cannot give everyone permissions to use that command.
I'd say +1 if an in-game role would be added like "Trusted Role"
And if abusable, punishments should be issued.
Evidence should be provided to staff team aswell.
- Punishment ideas -
First time abuse: Warn
Second time abuse: Revoke role + infraction
GhostFace. wrote:
For that, Roles should be added. You cannot give everyone permissions to use that command.
I'd say +1 if an in-game role would be added like "Trusted Role"
And if abusable, punishments should be issued.
Evidence should be provided to staff team aswell.
- Punishment ideas -
First time abuse: Warn
Second time abuse: Revoke role + infraction
+1 a trusted player role who can initiate a votekick for other regular players to kick the cheater is a must.
also no cooldowns either this should be as spammable as possible with proof of the cheater flying, tping and causing harm to players
+1 great suggestions
I think that besides being a regular player another requirement should be that you’ve been playing on the server for over a year (maybe more?) as that would definitely be helpful against possible abuse of the command. As others already said you should be required to have video evidence before starting a vote
MRA 💼 Junior Associate 💼
Clairo enjoyer | FREE LUIGI
Hoodtax Association of America
this is a good suggestion it takes like 3 hours or 4 hours max for a mod to join if the server pop is low and ban a cheater ruining the server for everybody +1
Its a very good idea +1 but there should be a way to prevent people from abusing this
This is a great suggestion and should be taken into consideration. If given to "Trusted Players" I got a few people in mind that are always on and reliable example: Vuitton$ for starters.
I don't know how the scripting scale will go about it whether its easy for mike or the development team. But this will be something useful to add in the future.
+9999999999
+1
How great it is to be absent yet present, rather than to be present yet absent.
no updates, what's the point of suggesting? Btw already suggested by me and idk where did it go. Same role related stuff was suggested by me.
BrainDeadFartSniffer wrote:
no updates, what's the point of suggesting? Btw already suggested by me and idk where did it go. Same role related stuff was suggested by me.
yea but when we realize its patchy everyone just automatically assumes its something stupid