Literally what the title says. The current limit is 130 and what Is the problem with increasing It? There is literally no problem, you are punishing someone who has a better pc that way. And before you start stating shit like "HIGH FPS IS UNFAIR" then stfu and listen. 1st scenario DM - 130 fps already allows you to seamlessly strafe with Deagle and shotguns and there are no other benefits about It. Literally. You magically don't fire faster or deal more damage and other shit. so lifting the fps limit wouldn't even make an issue LMFAO. I used to play on 50-70 fps and I still had almost the same chances as when playing with high fps like 400-600 It's only a matter of skill. 2nd scenario Regular game - Harder to drive, harder to swim, for people with non-mastered rifles harder to aim, more damage dealt against you with the chainsaw. I mean some people would sacrifice the comfort of gameplay for a smoother framerate and that's fine at this point It's their decision. High fps don't give you shit like faster animations or shit. In the long run, It makes your experience shittier so It should be a player's decision how they want to play. I feel bad for 240hz users tho and thanks for reading 😉
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
Well i don't think they will remove fps cap directly, so 230 fps limit not that bad tho. "+1"
puuro wrote:
Cap at 200 fps
Even this
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
would love mike to tell me 2 good reasons on why he isnt removing the fps limit.
shit players complaining about "high fps" isnt a reason...
So ye i really wanna see what he has to say
punisher wrote:
would love mike to tell me 2 good reasons on why he isnt removing the fps limit.
shit players complaining about "high fps" isnt a reason...
So ye i really wanna what he has to say
1.15
Everyone used to force grandma skins cuz shit players need to counter them
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
punisher wrote:
would love mike to tell me 2 good reasons on why he isnt removing the fps limit.
shit players complaining about "high fps" isnt a reason...
So ye i really wanna see what he has to say
even if he won't remove it, at least make maximum fps = 230/200
but i guess he will say "its not a dm server" and then topic moved to rejected suggestion.
Ralsei wrote:
Literally what the title says. The current limit is 130 and what Is the problem with increasing It? There is literally no problem, you are punishing someone who has a better pc that way. And before you start stating shit like "HIGH FPS IS UNFAIR" then stfu and listen. 1st scenario DM - 130 fps already allows you to seamlessly strafe with Deagle and shotguns and there are no other benefits about It. Literally. You magically don't fire faster or deal more damage and other shit. so lifting the fps limit wouldn't even make an issue LMFAO. I used to play on 50-70 fps and I still had almost the same chances as when playing with high fps like 400-600 It's only a matter of skill. 2nd scenario Regular game - Harder to drive, harder to swim, for people with non-mastered rifles harder to aim, more damage dealt against you with the chainsaw. I mean some people would sacrifice the comfort of gameplay for a smoother framerate and that's fine at this point It's their decision. High fps don't give you shit like faster animations or shit. In the long run, It makes your experience shittier so It should be a player's decision how they want to play. I feel bad for 240hz users tho and thanks for reading 😉
Isn't there a hard capped limit of 110 FPS in SAMP? I might be wrong, but you cannot break this limit without external scripts.

Kittycatmur wrote:
Isn't there a hard capped limit of 110 FPS in SAMP? I might be wrong, but you cannot break this limit without external scripts.
Said mod is allowed in MCNR but Mike set a fps cap of 130
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
Ralsei wrote:
Said mod is allowed in MCNR but Mike set a fps cap of 130
Rules state as follows:
Forbidden Mods
You must NOT use mods that:
- Give you an advantage over a player that doesn't have the mod
- Alter the way a part of the game works, such as changing animations or how weapon reloading works for example
- Change any object/vehicle/weapon models or collisions in any way, as they will not sync with other players
- Add objects into the game world that are not normally there
- Remove objects from the game world that are normally there
- Another player would notice, for example changing animations or vehicle models
- Any mods that affect the game camera are not allowed. This includes Field-of-view (FOV) changes, first-person camera, and such.
- Removal of blacked-out area of Sniper Scope.
- Cirucmvention of server-scripted things, such as Sniper reloading animations.
- Potato mod is outright banned. It removes objects from the world.
Allowed Mods
Generally, the following mods are allowed:
- Texture mods (as long as you aren't making walls invisible or something)
- Any sound mods
- UI/HUD mods such as rescaled/restyled HUD and text, unless it give you an advantage (such as bigger radar)
- Any other mod that doesn't go against the forbidden mod rules. For example removing loading screens.
Said mod isn't in allowed section, and is clearly in forbidden section as one that "Alter the way a part of the game works". Can you please explain what do you mean by saying "Said mod is allowed in MCNR"?

Increased FPS greatly increases ability to push vehicles. Watch the video for comression 20 fps vs 90. I believe 200 fps will allow you to run through vehicles like they don't even exist. So basicly you are suggesting to legitimate a hack.
https://youtu.be/Woxqoz60MpcThere is another benefit - with high FPS when moving, you can change move direction quite a bit faster which gives advantage in PVP. SAMP is greatly very much dependent on FPS, many other things changes when FPS increases.
Kittycatmur wrote:
Rules state as follows:Said mod isn't in allowed section, and is clearly in forbidden section as one that "Alter the way a part of the game works". Can you please explain what do you mean by saying "Said mod is allowed in MCNR"?
Mike allowing crashes.asi (mod to uncap the fps) but If you cap your fps at 130 using RTSS or shit. Even admins use it Lmao
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
And yeah fuck outta here with your car pushing meanwhile there's 300 pingers who can't get rammed by a car
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
Ralsei wrote:
Mike allowing crashes.asi (mod to uncap the fps) but If you cap your fps at 130 using RTSS or shit. Even admins use it Lmao
I believe he allowed it only because it fixes crashes and Mike just doesn't see another way to prevent them from happening.
Ralsei wrote:
And yeah fuck outta here with your car pushing meanwhile there's 300 pingers who can't get rammed by a car
Such stupid logic. Asking to allow hacks because of pingers? It will never happen, no matter how much you don't like it.
It's not like you're gonna benefit from car pushing so rarely
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division