Well done sir!
I found a couple confuses in following clauses:
1)
rjpars21 wrote:
Allowed to take down a criminal
- A Orange/Red suspect armed is fleeing away using vehicles.
I suppose you meant "air vehicles". In this case law enforcers are allowed to take the aircraft down
regardless of suspect's armament availability.
2)
rjpars21 wrote:
- A Orange/Red suspect is using a vehicle and car[1] to ram a person or officer[2] that lead to officer murdered.
I think the fact that the suspect is trying to ram people using vehicle is already enough for them to get shot.
3)
rjpars21 wrote:
Allowed to take down a criminal
- A Orange/Red suspect A warning showed up that wanted is[3] unarmed but there are indications according to their /crimes that they recently murdered or assaulted a person, sometimes this may be a trap for officers.
Repeats listed above:
rjpars21 wrote:
Allowed to take down a criminal
- A Orange/Red suspect commited a murder, shooting in public, or murdered a person/officer[4] recently ( ~ 1 hour ago (Ingame time).
P.s. I would consider it for at least 1 ingame day (24 minutes).
4)
I can't see the need in
rjpars21 wrote:
Optional
clauses since you've already listed
allowances.
[1] - A single "vehicle" is enough 🙂
[2], [4] - Officers are also humans
[3] - Could be replaced with following: "is reported to be"
Still, great job! Expecting Mike to check this.
Please stop +REP'ing me. I already know I'm most authoritative here
