-1 For the idea of choosing the city you want I think that the current automatic change between cities (from one week to another to change the city) is good and does not require change.
+1 for the idea of changing the weather you like, this will help a lot with the way some players play.
+1 for rain
City is not necessary cuz some players might need that 3 sec to finish something and a voting could make them work more
City change is fine as it is. I don't recognise a lower playerbase when the active city is San Fierro.
I agree for a weather change votation but I'm 100% sure Mike will reject the weather votation because he seeks "realism" and a lot of people here are low-end users who dislike the rain because they tend to get lower fps due to the rain or the roads are slippery (some people don't mind it)
+1 for both san fierro and rain sucks
-1 nah bad weather is also a part of game and cities are good no need to change
Weather is part of the game and rain is fun so -1