FPS CAP REMOVAL 2025

+1

x4x wrote:
The more FPS, the more the game will be broken... I would be happy if it gets increased to 144 at least (got a 144 hz monitor 😀 )

make it 150 cap so we don't have to see dropping 1 fps or increasing 1 fps

No.

Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.

San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.

AllyLily wrote:
No.

Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.

San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.

I second that.

Gta sa is so easy to run that I have up to 700 fps on a pc with 2009 cpu, get yo shit right everyone can run it. Also the way It impacts gameplay is non existent you don't deal extra dmg, you don't move faster. It's all hivemind

AllyLily wrote:
No.

Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.

San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.

Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase? The only reason you brought up, is that some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?

AllyLily wrote:
No.

Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.

San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.

Who is going to leave over that

Devils wrote:
Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase? The only reason you brought up, is that some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?

No reasonable explanation, made up that part to earn some mike points. There are far better reasons for players to leave this server other than an FPS cap removal. For example, being shot with explosive ammo by an undercover staff member and the hiring of corrupt ban evading thugs like overdoz who leak player data.

Devils wrote:
Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase?

Instant takeoff when escaping in a heli from LSPD/LVPD jail, anyone? The ability to move cars like they're cardboard?

Devils wrote:
Some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?

As opposed to catering to the whims of a well-off minority who can and want to? You can't deny that most of the SA-MP playerbase comes from places that don't have the economic privileges some of y'all have.

Not that many people like having others have advantages over them in a game either.

s1mple wrote:
No reasonable explanation, made up that part to earn some mike points.

Mike definitely does not need my opinion to make decisions. If you want to paint me as some sort of yes-woman, you have to also recognize that I have provided criticism of his past decisions as well. No need to get personal here.

s1mple wrote:
There are far better reasons for players to leave this server other than an FPS cap removal.

Good point, but we're specifically talking about FPS limits here.

AllyLily wrote:
Instant takeoff when escaping in a heli from LSPD/LVPD jail, anyone? The ability to move cars like they're cardboard?

You could probably count on one hand the times that this has affected someone. Situations where FPS would matter are so niche, its stupid to even try and mention these as points.

Again, you provided no actual reason why FPS should be capped, just pointless blabber. You also act like SAMP is a hard to run game, when in reality most people without "economic priviledges" could run it above 130 fps.

Remember that It says REMOVAL, WE WANT IT REMOVED 144 FPS IS NOT ENOUGH

dont put mike into pressure, 144 is enough, -1.

I'll do a +1 when I buy an i9 14th gen, 4090, 32 GB ram laptop/pc

Veteran950 wrote:
I'll do a +1 when I buy an i9 14th gen, 4090, 32 GB ram laptop/pc

Like your +1 or -1 have a huge impact on this suggestion 😆

Andualem wrote:
Like your +1 or -1 have a huge impact on this suggestion 😆

like ur comment also have a huge impact on this

Veteran950 wrote:
dont put mike into pressure, 144 is enough, -1.

I'll do a +1 when I buy an i9 14th gen, 4090, 32 GB ram laptop/pc

Congrats! You earned 7 MikePoints from your post!