I think its good Suggestion
+1
Suggestion Regarding Property Expiration
+1, house hogging is not cool at all
+1 fuck the propfags
This is already in place, but it must be bugged.
It only checks when the server starts, for inactive house owners (offline for > 28 days).
denim If you could please point me to a property that has an inactive owner, I can look into it.
It only checks when the server starts, for inactive house owners (offline for > 28 days).
denim If you could please point me to a property that has an inactive owner, I can look into it.
I also did the same with a house I manage to get after a month, I monitored a player/house to see his activities and the player didn't come online for 30 days, after awhile and asking admins they managed to put the house on sale, and I was quick enough to drive there and buy the house. Maybe have this property reset command to work again, but I don't see it being high priority for mike to fix right now, but good suggestion it's similar to the one we currently have 🙂
Staff don’t have the ability to force a house for sale. Unless a manager deleted the player’s account which is very unlikely.
I did originally want to base the system for selling inactive houses on whether or not the player physically visited the property but just because you don’t visit a property doesn’t mean you’re not actively using either as a spawn point or for vehicle storage. It gets more complicated.
Plus, if someone has a property that they don’t need to visit too often, it isn’t really cool to just take that property from them.
The maximum number of owned properties is currently 5. When I add a tiered donation system this will be reduced to 3 and donators will get more.
I did originally want to base the system for selling inactive houses on whether or not the player physically visited the property but just because you don’t visit a property doesn’t mean you’re not actively using either as a spawn point or for vehicle storage. It gets more complicated.
Plus, if someone has a property that they don’t need to visit too often, it isn’t really cool to just take that property from them.
The maximum number of owned properties is currently 5. When I add a tiered donation system this will be reduced to 3 and donators will get more.
Ok mike i will try to get in game and pinpoint the house whose owner wasn't active for months 🙂
Mike wrote:3 maximum houses is very little to leave it like this at 5
Staff don’t have the ability to force a house for sale. Unless a manager deleted the player’s account which is very unlikely.
I did originally want to base the system for selling inactive houses on whether or not the player physically visited the property but just because you don’t visit a property doesn’t mean you’re not actively using either as a spawn point or for vehicle storage. It gets more complicated.
Plus, if someone has a property that they don’t need to visit too often, it isn’t really cool to just take that property from them.
The maximum number of owned properties is currently 5. When I add a tiered donation system this will be reduced to 3 and donators will get more.
Arriba España
LinkOscuro457 wrote:
3 maximum houses is very little to leave it like this at 5
Mike is making it so that it is worth while to donate and to keep the server running. I think that is fair, three houses is quite a few also. That is one in each major city (or 3 in one.. etc). That is completely fair for him to give bonuses to donators.
how about just adding more properties for donors and keeping the regular limit on 5. seems like a better idea tbh because regular players have always had the chance to have 5 properties , after that update donors would have what regular players previously had but with a higher price , it just isnt worth it that much.
Flyburger wrote:
Currently it's based on activity in the server of player, if you didn't come online for a month or so then property will be sold to bank. I'm neutral for this suggestion since it's kinda nice but a bit unnecessary.
and what about these types of players (me) who are banned? Will they also lose their property??
Please make the banned people's properties will not be sold. If they are unbanned and they aren't coming online at least 3 months or 1 month then let the property be sold
[P wrote:atchyDaBUSTA link=topic=3471.msg19357#msg19357 date=1595086744]Not going to happened
and what about these types of players (me) who are banned? Will they also lose their property??
Please make the banned people's properties will not be sold. If they are unbanned and they aren't coming online at least 3 months or 1 month then let the property be sold
I think 3 houses for a normal player is fine, why would someone need so many properties it's nothing exclusive tbh. I think what Mike said is fair enough.
Mickey wrote:
I think 3 houses for a normal player is fine, why would someone need so many properties it's nothing exclusive tbh. I think what Mike said is fair enough.
What about me? If that only one poor house gets trashed?? for me it's like -1 for banned players and +1 for in active players...
[P wrote:atchyDaBUSTA link=topic=3471.msg19370#msg19370 date=1595091239]
What about me? If that only one poor house gets trashed?? for me it's like -1 for banned players and +1 for in active players...
lol fanny
