Mido wrote:
You're just proving my point, so mr. Punisher. I should do as you're saying and ban him for aimbot because;
- I have a proof that was literally recorded fucking 6 months ago.
- Because he's hacking in CB (Because I said so as well) >🙁
fucking hell why am i even explaining something i clearly know and im right about xdddd
go on piss off u said u dont have time for internet quibbling
Mido wrote:
You're just proving my point, so mr. Punisher. I should do as you're saying and ban him for aimbot because;
- I have a proof that was literally recorded fucking 6 months ago.
- Because he's hacking in CB (Because I said so as well) >🙁
Is true that hacking in others servers is not a good proof for ban someone.
But the videos provided (not care if are 6 months old or 1 day old) shows a CLEAR USAGE OF AIMBOT for me.
Comeon guys, this player sprays with M4 and dont miss a single bullet while the target keep running left/right? This Is not enough? I think that other cheaters have been banned with weaker proofs in the past months and this JohnGotti Is also known for his child behaviour, ngl he's a damn milk kid playing sa:mp.
Watch again the videos, slow It down and tell me that hes not aimbotting lol.
Multiple staff members looked into the footage supplied in the original post, which you linked in your main entry here punisher There were multiple staff who concluded that there was insufficient evidence, this includes staff members amongst the likes of Cashewz who are trusted when it comes to their judgement of aimbot.
Whilst we understand that you are concerned, the clips provided do not meet our requirement of being able to successfully ban the player. We require at least 3 clips, or be it multiple clips combined together or it being blatantly obvious aimbot. They are suspicious clips, however the user being shot by the player of concern isn't exactly attempting to evade the shots.
We will re-review the original post, and make an informed decision again. If more clips could be provided, that would be extremely helpful as well.
Edit: While I understand your concern of the current staff team, the way we hire new members is based off multiple factors. This includes game knowledge, activity, and the ability to handle tough situations. The application process, gives us a brief overview of the individual. We are able to determine their suitability during their probation period. Just because a staff member isn't the greatest at detecting aimbot, doesn't mean they won't excel at other areas within the staff team.
Edit: I will post an update here, once we have made another decision on the original post
Karbz wrote:
Edit: While I understand your concern of the current staff team, the way we hire new members is based off multiple factors. This includes game knowledge, activity, and the ability to handle tough situations. The application process, gives us a brief overview of the individual. We are able to determine their suitability during their probation period. Just because a staff member isn't the greatest at detecting aimbot, doesn't mean they won't excel at other areas within the staff team
thats why when it comes to aimbot, i dont wanna see any other staff members expect for "aimbot detectives"
punisher That is completely understandable, please just note that an aimbot detective may not always be available to comment on a post. More than often, if a response is of "not enough evidence", or "will be banned" it is because an aimbot detective has given the all clear to go with that verdict. It's not just staff making up the decision on their own.
punisher wrote:
thats why when it comes to aimbot, i dont wanna see any other staff members expect for "aimbot detectives"
Kindly note that not all Aimbot detectives are constantly active and available at your service. They involve Moderators and Admins to address Aimbot Complaints. All evidence is assessed by Aimbot Detectives, who solely make the final decisions. Admins and Moderators do not handle Aimbot Complaints, so please stop making assumptions. As Karbz mentioned, we're currently investigating the initial post.
Locked until further notice.
