Money reset at version 2.0?

I have to say -1, if money reset is gonna happen then I think that Mike should change something about the economy, price of cars, rewards from robbing and from reaching lvl 100, because it's already so easy to gain money here, which means there is a big competition on a bigger pool, which is who has more " millions ", and who is richer not who actually has money, and there are players that are way older than us which deserve to be having 10M+ money as they have grinded more which makes it unfair to money reset, however it doesn't affect me at all because I am a new player myself.

My opinion is that there should be a money reset for sure but not a reset for vehicles,houses,achievements,score etc at last
+1 for money reset
-1 for other resets

I honestly just saw this and i totally agree.
I honestly made from selling and buying houses mainly an amount of around 16 millions with just a one week gameplay and when my score was even lower than 10k.
I personally don't think all money should be reset but maybe they can take a big amount like around 80% and make it harder to earn money so later on we won't have the same proem with economy. Because after i made all this money i dont really feel im playing for any reason. No reason and no goals to play for.
- 1
Just because im not with the idea of totally resetting money as some players worked hard for it!

+1 for money reset and global

DedeLukas wrote:
+1

+1/-1 with no additional explanation.

Warned.

To be honest, I don't personally understand why people don't want money resets. What's the point of keeping the money when the new version releases? To me, it's completely boring because I personally don't have a goal I could work myself to. People start to not care about their money and they spend it on useless shit. If we could get a money reset, people would be more responsible with their money and they would actually be motivated to get money again.

Well yes you're right somehow but it isn't fair to treat old players who worked their ass off and made a certain amount of money similar to new players ! I am with the idea of resetting money to save the economy but not totally .. Like 75% of the money each player has or maybe a little more  would be enough to make the  economy great again! It is not fair to make an old player grind again to buy his old car again! It will certainly make us lose a huge amount of players! And then we would have saved the economy but lost the players! And of course mike can somehow manage to reduce the money made from achievement and make money grinding a little bit harder! Example fishing : You can easily fish for like an hour and then make around 100k easily! This is just one example from many others!
So as my opinion, if they will reset money totally , i personally am against this idea!
Many other ideas can be found to save the economy , not only totally resetting player's money!

Is it just money or everything like mansions, vehicles,etc?

BTW I support this idea. I don't know what will I do with my money.
Maybe make it more difficult to earn  in the next version, or just make other things more costly.
If we are talking about a reset thing then there should be more payouts for workers too. Or else the whole server will engage themselves in robbing banks and earning and no one will go for public services.

anthony_ishak wrote:
Well yes you're right somehow but it isn't fair to treat old players who worked their ass off and made a certain amount of money similar to new players ! I am with the idea of resetting money to save the economy but not totally .. Like 75% of the money each player has or maybe a little more  would be enough to make the  economy great again! It is not fair to make an old player grind again to buy his old car again! It will certainly make us lose a huge amount of players! And then we would have saved the economy but lost the players! And of course mike can somehow manage to reduce the money made from achievement and make money grinding a little bit harder! Example fishing : You can easily fish for like an hour and then make around 100k easily! This is just one example from many others!
So as my opinion, if they will reset money totally , i personally am against this idea!
Many other ideas can be found to save the economy , not only totally resetting player's money!

Well, you could donate a share of your 13 mln dollars to me. I will put them in good use.

anthony_ishak wrote:
Well yes you're right somehow but it isn't fair to treat old players who worked their ass off and made a certain amount of money similar to new players ! I am with the idea of resetting money to save the economy but not totally .. Like 75% of the money each player has or maybe a little more  would be enough to make the  economy great again! It is not fair to make an old player grind again to buy his old car again! It will certainly make us lose a huge amount of players! And then we would have saved the economy but lost the players! And of course mike can somehow manage to reduce the money made from achievement and make money grinding a little bit harder! Example fishing : You can easily fish for like an hour and then make around 100k easily! This is just one example from many others!
So as my opinion, if they will reset money totally , i personally am against this idea!
Many other ideas can be found to save the economy , not only totally resetting player's money!

This makes no sense. Old players will still have the advantage if they have a lot of money, even if 75% of their money gets taken, cause they will have more money after the reset. A full reset is necessary, there's no doubt.

Full reset +1

Mike needs to balance achievement payouts and all job payouts too.

cynosy They are supposed to have advantage as they worked their ass to make that money! But by reducing a huge percentage of their money and mike making earning money harder and etc , we will fix the economy and won't lose players.

support money reset +1

but score shouldn't be reset bruh it will hurt -1 for other resets

RiP mony -1

it may be best to do so was one house (or two) for one man?