More No-Fly Zones

This will develop an already existing feature & bring the gamemode to a more realistic state and/or closer to the original.

We already have a no-fly zone enforced by SAM sites over Area 69. It would make perfect sense to have one over the Easter Basin Naval Station as well, as the two SAM sites there are currently "disabled".

In other areas:
- LSIA (for players w/o a pilot license)
- Easter Bay Airport (for players w/o a pilot license)
- Las Venturas Airport (for players w/o a pilot license)

- LSPD rooftop
- SFPD rooftop, parking space, and helipad
- LVPD rooftop

- medical facility rooftops (if/when we do get around to making them functional a thing)

- Ocean Docks National Guard Depot
- KACC Military Fuels (which should only be enterable for emergency services & civilians with a truck, for hauling purposes)

the no-fly zone would also be announced using the Fort Zancudo air control lines that don't mention a takedown, but only be enforced with a trespassing charge, similarly to how it works in GTA V.

+1 for overall

-1 for LSPD/LVPD/SFPD, it will become difficult to play as a criminal.

I don't think SAM Turrets are going to be present in normal civilian airports neither on police stations.

Sakamoto_Taro wrote:
-1 for LSPD/LVPD/SFPD, it will become difficult to play as a criminal.

Not by a bit. There is already a trespassing charge in all three of those places, and adding a visual/audio effect to announce that won't make things harder, if not simplify them (in the case we decide to offset the charge by a couple seconds after the warning is issued).

Khaz wrote:
I don't think SAM Turrets are going to be present in normal civilian airports neither on police stations.

Take a second look, I'm not suggesting it:

the no-fly zone would also be announced using the Fort Zancudo air control lines that don't mention a takedown, but only be enforced with a trespassing charge, similarly to how it works in GTA V.

I find that kind of zones annoying so I will vote - 1 😛