Imagine no fps cap, people living in happiness
https://youtu.be/YkgkThdzX-8?si=G3XpxRi9RZ7FaOoo
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
FPS CAP REMOVAL 2025
absolutely fucking not im fucking poor
Fapfvl wrote:
absolutely fucking not im fucking poor
so? we don't care about ur pc
+1
Veteran950 wrote:
we don't care about ur pc
who the fuck cares about you??
Fapfvl wrote:
who the fuck cares about you??
u, that's why u replied back
The more FPS, the more the game will be broken... I would be happy if it gets increased to 144 at least (got a 144 hz monitor 😀 )
+1
#Freedom for Palestine🇵🇸
x4x wrote:
The more FPS, the more the game will be broken... I would be happy if it gets increased to 144 at least (got a 144 hz monitor 😀 )
make it 150 cap so we don't have to see dropping 1 fps or increasing 1 fps
No.
Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.
San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.
Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.
San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.
AllyLily wrote:
No.
Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.
San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.
I second that.
Gta sa is so easy to run that I have up to 700 fps on a pc with 2009 cpu, get yo shit right everyone can run it. Also the way It impacts gameplay is non existent you don't deal extra dmg, you don't move faster. It's all hivemind
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
AllyLily wrote:
No.
Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.
San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.
Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase? The only reason you brought up, is that some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?
AllyLily wrote:
No.
Some of your suggestions are interesting, Rals, but you need to stop regurgitating this non-issue. The FPS cap is there for a reason. Removing it will solve no problems for anyone except esthetic feels and will hurt the gameplay for everyone else in the process.
San Andreas was not engineered for 500 FPS or however much y'all want. But if you want the experience, there's always singleplayer or DM servers that allow this abomination. We can't afford to lose 90% of the already sparse playerbase because the first-world bourgeoisie can't but bat an eye at one fewer FPS.
Who is going to leave over that
Devils wrote:
Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase? The only reason you brought up, is that some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?
No reasonable explanation, made up that part to earn some mike points. There are far better reasons for players to leave this server other than an FPS cap removal. For example, being shot with explosive ammo by an undercover staff member and the hiring of corrupt ban evading thugs like overdoz who leak player data.
Best regards,
Senior Associate
MRA (MCNR Reporting Association)
Senior Associate
MRA (MCNR Reporting Association)
Devils wrote:
Can you actually explain how will this hurt the playerbase?
Instant takeoff when escaping in a heli from LSPD/LVPD jail, anyone? The ability to move cars like they're cardboard?
Devils wrote:
Some players can’t run a game from 2004 therefore the server should cater to them?
As opposed to catering to the whims of a well-off minority who can and want to? You can't deny that most of the SA-MP playerbase comes from places that don't have the economic privileges some of y'all have.
Not that many people like having others have advantages over them in a game either.
s1mple wrote:
No reasonable explanation, made up that part to earn some mike points.
Mike definitely does not need my opinion to make decisions. If you want to paint me as some sort of yes-woman, you have to also recognize that I have provided criticism of his past decisions as well. No need to get personal here.
s1mple wrote:
There are far better reasons for players to leave this server other than an FPS cap removal.
Good point, but we're specifically talking about FPS limits here.