Rule change suggestion (credit to saz)
"player A and B has revenge on player C, they both kill player C, their revenge ends, not like otherwise like its now, player B claims the kill of player C meanwhile player A assisted and player A is allowed to kill player C once more, because he didn't "claim" the kill. its a stupid endless loop of DM" - saz
This could be changed, so if you assist in a revenge, your revenge is claimed as well.
New rule - If a cop is flying a rustler, every criminal is allowed to shoot down the rustler.
This rule will benefit the criminals, cops are OP with rustlers, especially after we allowed that MW can be killed by cops. So, if a cop is flying a rustler, criminals have a valid reason to shoot the rustler down.
Rule Clarifications - WIP
Locked
Rule suggestion
If player A is seeking revenge on player B, who dies during a fight without an actual killfeed message "Player A killed Player B with " by drowning, falling or exploding of a vehicle, revenge should count as claimed.
If player A is seeking revenge on player B, who dies during a fight without an actual killfeed message "Player A killed Player B with " by drowning, falling or exploding of a vehicle, revenge should count as claimed.
