this issue has been taken to mike already, all helicopters should not be able to buy armour, it's fix is currently pending (most likely in the next update)
Addition in Rule: Sea Sparrow Armor - Make it Punishable
GtaFreak wrote:
this issue has been taken to mike already, all helicopters should not be able to buy armour, it's fix is currently pending (most likely in the next update)
Hiya GtaFreak.
It is good to bring attention to the fact this is a known bug and a fix is pending for it.
I think denim's suggestion was to make it so that using the vehicle armour bug exploit is explicitly (well known) as against the rules in the interim.
This is so that players who do this are aware and there is possible recourse for the victims.
We don't know necessarily how long it will be until this is fixed.
My personal opinion is that PSO & loss of a rank or two would be sufficient (given that police combat air-vehicles require rank 10).
Rated 5/5.
+1 With that i saw alot people abusing it.
denim You are speaking out of my heart
Tschüss ihr kacklappen
Admired of this mega shit death 😛 it hurts ik, i support this
Greetings,
Was wondering who rejected this suggestion & what the rationale was for doing so (given this was rated highly / responded to positively including by some Staff) ?
As far as I understood it vehicle armour is not intended for vehicles such as the Seasparrow and accordingly a fix is pending / planned for this - which is good.
However, in the meantime surely it makes sense that obtaining vehicle armour where it is clearly unintended and confers an unfair advantage be covered in the rules in the interim ? For example under exploit / bug abuse.
I've seen a few players doing this now.
Flyburger Apologies for raising this in the #rule-clarification channel of the MCNR Discord Server - I didn't know I could respond to a rejected suggestion on the forum and couldn't think of anywhere else to ask about this. Noted going forward.
Was wondering who rejected this suggestion & what the rationale was for doing so (given this was rated highly / responded to positively including by some Staff) ?
As far as I understood it vehicle armour is not intended for vehicles such as the Seasparrow and accordingly a fix is pending / planned for this - which is good.
However, in the meantime surely it makes sense that obtaining vehicle armour where it is clearly unintended and confers an unfair advantage be covered in the rules in the interim ? For example under exploit / bug abuse.
I've seen a few players doing this now.
Flyburger Apologies for raising this in the #rule-clarification channel of the MCNR Discord Server - I didn't know I could respond to a rejected suggestion on the forum and couldn't think of anywhere else to ask about this. Noted going forward.
2shot was also counted as Bug abuse
Yet nobody was banned for it until Mike said so
Yet nobody was banned for it until Mike said so
Nobody can escape their sins, everyone gets punished whether it takes a day or an eternity.
You can change who you are, but you cannot run from yourself.
You can change who you are, but you cannot run from yourself.