Once and for all, We would never recognize someone who chose status over representing us as a BloodZ. Now or ever.
puuro wrote:
says B member
You can't discredit the facts I state by saying I'm biased. They're still facts.
kvn wrote:
Maybe no dimiss but atleast don't give them roles such as Aimbot Detective when they don't deserve it.
Might as well delete/archive this topic because that's not the topic you created.
Ralsei wrote:
1. Aimbot is easiest thing to detect, especially with upcomign Samp R4 ban which will eliminate usage of SAMPFUNCS, software which allowed for sneakier cheating.
Do you know how many aimbot softwares have been created and still being made to this day? Silent ones, hardly noticable ones, and blatant ones. Ones that do not require any files in the game folder nor SAMPFUNCS. Compared to any other cheats used in this game, Aimbot is the god of cheats. What is "easiest" relative to in your sentence!?
Ralsei wrote:
3. Dan's experience is irrelevant, he denies reports with evident aimbot and It suddenly turns out said people are actually cheating. Another statement which proves how he's not competent.
How is someone's experience irrelevant to their competence? It's literally in the definition.
Ralsei wrote:
5. Forum encourages freedom of speech, we're not promoting hate on any of said staff members, just stating facts and we are looking for a change.
Admins aren't chosen by public voting for a reason. Online games and servers don't survive by allowing online underage communities to make decisions.
