Suggestion Regarding Property Expiration

Hello,

I'd like to suggest to add property expiration to the houses we own. I don't know if it has been suggested before or not. but anyway im suggesting it.
I have seen a lot of Inactive Players who still owns Good houses/mansions in the server but are in-active in the server from past few months. Few weeks ago i have visited one of my houses in Dillimore i guess. and it was last visited by me "A month ago" Still i owned that place.

So there should be a system that can make the house go un owned like it can sell it to the server if the players are not visitng it. This way other Active Player can have the chance to own that particular property. This goes for every house around San Andreas.

Now this can be done on the basis of certain Time period like 15 days if a Player is not visiting the house for any reason. Either he's inactive or even if he's active and not visiting the place within the time period of 15 days. Once you visit the place within the given Time period. The time period of 15 days can be restart again, The property remains his.

Lemme know down below what You ppl think??

ye Sound good .. +1 . not for 15 days tho .

Currently it's based on activity in the server of player, if you didn't come online for a month or so then property will be sold to bank. I'm neutral for this suggestion since it's kinda nice but a bit unnecessary.

Yeah the 15 days time period is just an example to elaborate my suggestion. That's totally up to mike to decide.

I think its good Suggestion
+1

+1, house hogging is not cool at all

+1 fuck the propfags

This is already in place, but it must be bugged.

It only checks when the server starts, for inactive house owners (offline for > 28 days).

denim If you could please point me to a property that has an inactive owner, I can look into it.

I also did the same with a house I manage to get after a month, I monitored a player/house to see his activities and the player didn't come online for 30 days, after awhile and asking admins they managed to put the house on sale, and I was quick enough to drive there and buy the house. Maybe have this property reset command to work again, but I don't see it being high priority for mike to fix right now, but good suggestion it's similar to the one we currently have 🙂

Staff don’t have the ability to force a house for sale. Unless a manager deleted the player’s account which is very unlikely.

I did originally want to base the system for selling inactive houses on whether or not the player physically visited the property but just because you don’t visit a property doesn’t mean you’re not actively using either as a spawn point or for vehicle storage. It gets more complicated.


Plus, if someone has a property that they don’t need to visit too often, it isn’t really cool to just take that property from them.

The maximum number of owned properties is currently 5. When I add a tiered donation system this will be reduced to 3 and donators will get more.

Ok mike i will try to get in game and pinpoint the house whose owner wasn't active for months 🙂

Mike wrote:
Staff don’t have the ability to force a house for sale. Unless a manager deleted the player’s account which is very unlikely.

I did originally want to base the system for selling inactive houses on whether or not the player physically visited the property but just because you don’t visit a property doesn’t mean you’re not actively using either as a spawn point or for vehicle storage. It gets more complicated.


Plus, if someone has a property that they don’t need to visit too often, it isn’t really cool to just take that property from them.

The maximum number of owned properties is currently 5. When I add a tiered donation system this will be reduced to 3 and donators will get more.

3 maximum houses is very little to leave it like this at 5

LinkOscuro457 wrote:
3 maximum houses is very little to leave it like this at 5

Mike is making it so that it is worth while to donate and to keep the server running. I think that is fair, three houses is quite a few also. That is one in each major city (or 3 in one.. etc). That is completely fair for him to give bonuses to donators.

how about just adding more properties for donors and keeping the regular limit on 5. seems like a better idea tbh because regular players have always had the chance to have 5 properties , after that update donors would have what regular players previously had but with a higher price , it just isnt worth it that much.

Flyburger wrote:
Currently it's based on activity in the server of player, if you didn't come online for a month or so then property will be sold to bank. I'm neutral for this suggestion since it's kinda nice but a bit unnecessary.

and what about these types of players (me) who are banned? Will they also lose their property??
Please make the banned people's properties will not be sold. If they are unbanned and they aren't coming online at least 3 months or 1 month then let the property be sold