Ast wrote: Let me get straight to the entire point of this existence.
I can't believe I'm writing this paragraph, through and through.
I'm getting to the point of how this is getting out of hand.
First, you are complaining too much and appealing a pso that was expired and also already went in the past (almost 2 months ago).
Secondly, Topic #27823.0 was denied, but egjunge received a warning, so he will be careful as mentioned before.
Related: (secondly), the evidence is insufficient, as I said and mentioned before; where should I have known about the incident beforehand? you could be afk, and what happened? Did you just record the incident while you were away from the keyboard (AFK)?
Topic: Mike doesn't reply to player complaints, so 28012 can be denied. he reiles on staff complaints only if the highest role is against something, not player complaints, well, not much i can say.
The recent appeal was denied after "AOM" Shadowwalker sent his reply, and he said it was already handled: you have 0 points, and the recent infraction was reduced to 0 because you can't know if the revenge was active.
(27999) - This was rejected due to lack of evidences, don't expect me to how that works, when nobody haves evidence to support out, and what's going,
(27958 topic-related)
You are expecting unprofessionalism when the opposite isn't true; you are the one that can't seem to notice at all.
Fourth, i'm not targeting individuals as intended; this makes no absolute sense.