it was made private to protect abuser staff like clara +1 and this will be denied to protect more abusive staff
I'm personally against private complaints, it's less transparent. Management isn't required to publicly discipline staff but should decide on a complaint just like any other player complaint, so reportee knows the outcome.
+1
shabnam_panda wrote:
it was made private to protect abuser staff like clara +1 and this will be denied to protect more abusive staff
clara was a good staff I had good time robbing her.🤑 And she left the server.i was once got in an argument and trolled her badly lol
Combean0007 wrote:
I'm personally against private complaints, it's less transparent. Management isn't required to publicly discipline staff but should decide on a complaint just like any other player complaint, so reprotee knows the outcome.
+1
+1 exactly
Transparency helps a lot even if the punishment itself isn't disclosed.
Combean0007 wrote:
I'm personally against private complaints, it's less transparent. Management isn't required to publicly discipline staff but should decide on a complaint just like any other player complaint, so reportee knows the outcome.
+1
+1
Server needs a lot more transparency
MRA 💼 Junior Associate 💼
Clairo enjoyer | FREE LUIGI
Hoodtax Association of America
That true. Also Karbz not respond my discord messages. +1 😉
K.png (19 KB)
shabnam_panda wrote:
it was made private to protect abuser staff like clara +1 and this will be denied to protect more abusive staff
man pulled up and spit facts
+1 about public staff complaints
shabnam_panda wrote:
it was made private to protect abuser staff like clara +1 and this will be denied to protect more abusive staff
dont disrespect my favorite staff member like that ever again. instead, you should cut 6 crucial seconds from every rdm report you make.
+1 on the suggestion tho
top 1 most wanted cia list
BeatEn wrote:
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,14819.msg71102.html#msg71102
I agree it should be public though, much needed right now
what does the link refers to? I don't get it.
It's about making the punishments given should be public and I'm saying the reports itself should be public nor punishments
The procedure stays as it is. If it's not being responded to, contact the Operations Team. If they don't respond, let me know and I will get them to respond and find out why they haven't.
Having a public forum for people to slander staff and ruin their reputation because they're salty about often valid punishments is not something we want.
