Remove complaints page because It ruined the community and made it unbearably toxic
dead_bxnny
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
PD Deputy Chief
SAALCA Division
Remove 24 hour timelimit for complaints
-1
-1
Ast wrote:
-1
starseeker wrote:
-1
did howl call for backup?
-1
-1
+1 make it 3 days
BruceWayne wrote:
did howl call for backup?
Lol, all the no-self-thought admins came and voted -1. I bet this is a rule for lazy admins to have less workload and having no necessity to learn to read logs.
For the record :
It's not a coincidence, the very same admins that just voted minus 1, were the ones that ignored a incriminating video of a RULE-BREAKER just because it was posted "tOo lAtE"
Andualem (star seeker?) ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,28009.0.html
Ast ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,28012.0.html
Behemoth ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27879.0.html
Lol and just wait for Anth.onys vote, cause he didn't just ignore it but gaslighted as well. Cheeky bastards
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27988.0.html
Vicio wrote:
+1 make it 3 days
Sounds fair. 3 to 5 days
[i0V3RK1LLi wrote: link=topic=28021.msg134966#msg134966 date=1777476581]
Lol, all the no-self-thought admins came and voted -1. I bet this is a rule for lazy admins to have less workload and having no necessity to learn to read logs.
For the record :
It's not a coincidence, the very same admins that just voted minus 1, were the ones that ignored a incriminating video of a RULE-BREAKER just because it was posted "tOo lAtE"
Andualem (star seeker?) ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,28009.0.html
Ast ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,28012.0.html
Behemoth ignoring a RULE-BREAKER for "evidence timeout "
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27879.0.html
Lol and just wait for Anth.onys vote, cause he didn't just ignore it but gaslighted as well. Cheeky bastards
https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,27988.0.html
What are you talking about? Lol i think you have a hard time reading or understanding written rules because i showed you a clear image of Karbz making announcement saying reports that are reported after 24 hours are not going to be handled and you ignored that and created another report after seeing everything clearly
We all rejected your complaint because of the rule Karbz announced we are not going to by pass it we follow it so go and complain to Karbz about it not here
And also stop going off the suggestion topic your response has nothing to do with the suggestion
starseeker wrote:
What are you talking about? Lol i think you have a hard time reading or understanding written rules because i showed you a clear image of Karbz making announcement saying reports that are reported after 24 hours are not going to be handled and you ignored that and created another report after seeing everything clearly
We all rejected your complaint because of the rule Karbz announced we are not going to by pass it we follow it so go and complain to Karbz about it not here
And also stop going off the suggestion topic your response has nothing to do with the suggestion
Just because something is "LEGAL" doesn't make it FAIR.
Just because an "admin" decides one day to OVERRULE , in a third-party app as DC, rather than posting it and 📌 pin it in the OFFICIAL FORUM SECTION, that "Rulebreakers reported, no matter how incriminating is the evidence, after 24h will not be punished" doesn't make it FAIR .
It's called OVERRULING because it's overlapping a made-up rule over a PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS. Rulebreakers can't and shouldn't be absolved for technicalities, posted officially or not. You guys are ignoring, in this case. Solid valid evidence just because it was spotted 1 day later. Specially when evidence is conclusive and obvious, like video.
Players, not admins, are trying to get a fair amount of days to post. We are not saying "accept my logs.txt from a year ago", we are saying that if this shit rule will be a official thing, POST IT ON OFFICIAL FORUMS AND MAKE IT 3 -5 DAYS.
Just because an "admin" decides one day to OVERRULE , in a third-party app as DC, rather than posting it and 📌 pin it in the OFFICIAL FORUM SECTION, that "Rulebreakers reported, no matter how incriminating is the evidence, after 24h will not be punished" doesn't make it FAIR .
It's called OVERRULING because it's overlapping a made-up rule over a PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS. Rulebreakers can't and shouldn't be absolved for technicalities, posted officially or not. You guys are ignoring, in this case. Solid valid evidence just because it was spotted 1 day later. Specially when evidence is conclusive and obvious, like video.
Players, not admins, are trying to get a fair amount of days to post. We are not saying "accept my logs.txt from a year ago", we are saying that if this shit rule will be a official thing, POST IT ON OFFICIAL FORUMS AND MAKE IT 3 -5 DAYS.
[i0V3RK1LLi wrote: link=topic=28021.msg134969#msg134969 date=1777490602]Just because something is "LEGAL" doesn't make it FAIR.
Just because an "admin" decides one day to OVERRULE , in a third-party app as DC, rather than posting it and 📌 pin it in the OFFICIAL FORUM SECTION, that "Rulebreakers reported, no matter how incriminating is the evidence, after 24h will not be punished" doesn't make it FAIR .
It's called OVERRULING because it's overlapping a made-up rule over a PRINCIPLE OF FAIRNESS. Rulebreakers can't and shouldn't be absolved for technicalities, posted officially or not. You guys are ignoring, in this case. Solid valid evidence just because it was spotted 1 day later. Specially when evidence is conclusive and obvious, like video.
Players, not admins, are trying to get a fair amount of days to post. We are not saying "accept my logs.txt from a year ago", we are saying that if this shit rule will be a official thing, POST IT ON OFFICIAL FORUMS AND MAKE IT 3 -5 DAYS.
- Please refrain from posting in this 'topic' unless you intend to share your ideas that are relevant to the suggestions being discussed. If you continue to post irrelevant responses that do not pertain to this topic, I will have no choice but to issue a warning against you.
The 'SUGGESTIONS' Section is not intended for off-topic discussions: it is meant for sharing ideas, creating ideas, and voting. If you continue to post unrelated content here, I'll have no choice but to futher take action.
Ast wrote:
- Please refrain from posting in this 'topic' unless you intend to share your ideas that are relevant to the suggestions being discussed. If you continue to post irrelevant responses that do not pertain to this topic, I will have no choice but to issue a warning against you.
The 'SUGGESTIONS' Section is not intended for off-topic discussions: it is meant for sharing ideas, creating ideas, and voting. If you continue to post unrelated content here, I'll have no choice but to futher take action.
Woah, I justified my vote to this suggestion. That is it. Im saying why I think the rule is unfair and why I backup this suggestion.
In the suggestions section, we vote and give justification, a feedback to such votes.
Please, Don't refrain to Give us Your Feedback! 🤓
Now, please, to all negative voters:
Feel free to let us know WHY you vote -1 to this suggestion, and what you think of NOT ACCEPTING
any evidence just because it was posted after those 24h? No matter how incriminating or serious the post is?
Should be 5 days. +1
24 hours is too short of a window and not fair
24 hours is too short of a window and not fair
NO. If this is approved, we'll see players get punished for something after 1 week and nobody is gonna save the clips for 1 week.
+1 make it 1 hour
