Ban lengths...

cynosy wrote:
Your suggestion is to reduce ban lengths, not make neons available for non donators. Since when is saying my opinion about something ''provoking''? Neons were made for donators as a thank you for donating to the server. In the end, it's Mike's decision, not mine.

No, you're just telling unban for 10$ is p2w. So, isn't the neon also a p2w thingy?

We'll have a chance to play again, and a contribution to the server if unbanning is added. And neon is just for appearence.

Ofc, this server has nothing much to lose. But still, it should be added.


Waiting for Mike and more players' replies...

Bans are as it should be, if you're not valuing your account much, of course you'll end up banned severely times.

As for neons, they're just fancy looking stuff, nothing much of advantaging, so, it's great to have them for donators only.

Also, $10 unban looooooool

cheaters be like


nah, that's a very dumb suggestion. -1

ok rip mcnr. never gonna reach 200+ players online.

Thread locked till Mike replies...

Why should we allow players to pay to have their ban lifted?    When you first join the server, upon spawning you are forced to read the rules (If you don't read them, that is your own fault if you fail to adhere to the rules) which have been set in place by Mike to ensure everyone can enjoy their time on the server.  Players who cheat (aimbot, fly hacks, health hacks) do not deserve to play on the server.  If you go out of your way to cheat and break the rules which you were shown when you first started then you should suffer the consequences of being banned by the anti-cheat/server staff.

When a player is punished by staff (kick, mute, infraction, etc) They're given plenty, and I mean plenty of warnings before a ban is actually put into place.  The set ban lengths for infraction bans are not actually that severe either.  You're banned for 1 week, and the length of time goes up every time you are issued an infraction and go over the threshold.

You break the rules, you suffer the consequences.

SIMPLE AS THAT.

Thread unlocked for this:

If a player gets banned for 30 days, then he'll be able to purchase the unban.
If a player gets banned, and the ban time exceeds 30 days, he won't be able to buy it.

Now?

Make another thread for that

A 100+ player playerbase has nothing to do with how players are being punished. If you are a dumdum and you use cheats then you suffer the consequences of your actions. Buying an unban Will just turn it into: Let's try to be more careful with cheats this time.

Why do you even want it so badly? I even doubt its for the playerbase.

Listen man, you're saying this back to back tat

xVikrant wrote:
And if you want your way, then rip mcnr. It'll never reach that amount of players.

So I'd rather love to play a 70-80 player server playing with rules except a 200 players server full of cop DMers, cop hunters, RDMers and other rule breaking stuff including hacking.

xVikrant wrote:
No, you're just telling unban for 10$ is p2w. So, isn't the neon also a p2w thingy?

Man you even know what p2w means?
If neons is a feature for donator, it never ever in any case give us advantage. Which mean it isnt p2w.

xVikrant wrote:
ok rip mcnr. never gonna reach 200+ players online.

imagine playing with 100+ rule breaker constantly RDMing u. NAHHHH! I'm fine with 50-60 rule following players

player base is dependant on how decent the updates are, with a new conception of actual mikes, people can be more interested in playing this server more

so your "rip mcnr" because of this suggestion is meaningless whatsoever, it won't do no good at all

Actually, RDMers and other rule-breakers should be punished in another way, which I'll suggest later. I have an idea of how it should work.

And yeah, if they buy unban and again use cheats, it'll be a 1-year ban, and he cannot buy it again.

xVikrant wrote:
Actually, RDMers and other rule-breakers should be punished in another way, which I'll suggest later. I have an idea of how it should work.

Bro I guess first of all clear your concept about how your idea should really work and then suggest the whole idea.

stacJ wrote:
Bro I guess first of all clear your concept about how your idea should really work and then suggest the whole idea.

Yeah, I have already cleared. And about the ban lengths too. But you guys, make it like "NO NO NO"... & at last, I get - respects, that's all.

See the pole. How many "No" are there.

supported from me  😀

Just no. Also got rejected already here: https://mikescnr.com/forum/index.php/topic,7336.0.html


-Closed