FPS Cap removal suggestion #9999999999

[Ralsei]

I've spoke to alot of people regarding that. DMers or not, Majority said yes to removal. Do a public vote on discord or something. We are gonna fight for our rights and we back It up with approval of many people.

[puuro]

+1 it will never be lifted but i hate 130 fps

[Ralsei]

+1
waiting  for it to get rejected without any proper reasons

Same, waiting for these ignorant twerps

[Karbz]

I'd rather see the cap raised to about 250fps, but you start to seriously fuck up the game when you go above 60fps, in a perfect world it should be capped at 60 - 75fps that most people can easily reach unless you're using a potato.

Make it fair for everyone, - but I do support raising the cap, not total removal.

[puuro]

I'd rather see the cap raised to about 250fps, but you start to seriously fuck up the game when you go above 60fps, in a perfect world it should be capped at 60 - 75fps that most people can easily reach unless you're using a potato.

Make it fair for everyone, - but I do support raising the cap, not total removal.

Even 250 is better than 130.

[Kittycatmur]

Not fond of this suggestion, however, If this is ever going to be implemented, I at least ask the dev to check chainsaw DPS with 250+ fps, I think it might need a nerf since damage output depends on frame rate.
Immediate helicopter take off is a problem too, but at least it is something we can cope with.

[s1mple]

I at least ask the dev to check chainsaw DPS with 250+ fps, I think it might need a nerf since damage output depends on frame rate.

MCNR uses a server-side damage system, so FPS has no effect on damage.

[Kittycatmur]

MCNR uses a server-side damage system, so FPS has no effect on damage.

Incorrect. Server only alters damage values, not the fire/hit rate. And since currently higher FPS doesn't affect damage values, but affect fire/hit rate, increasing fps leads to higher DPS

[Ralsei]

Well I played MCNR on 500 fps and there was no dmg difference at all.

[Kittycatmur]

Well I played MCNR on 500 fps and there was no dmg difference at all.

Have you checked chainsaw specifically? I am only worried about that one, I am pretty sure the other ones will be ok

[Ralsei]

Have you checked chainsaw specifically? I am only worried about that one, I am pretty sure the other ones will be ok

Yeah. Normally you'd die to chainsaw in extremely quick time even on 130 fps so this isnt a thing to worry about

[Cashewz]

Incorrect. Server only alters damage values, not the fire/hit rate. And since currently higher FPS doesn't affect damage values, but affect fire/hit rate, increasing fps leads to higher DPS

There's very little to no difference fire rate changes from 60 FPS or above.

[puuro]

seems like management agrees no? 250 new cap or uncapped?

[Ralsei]

Yeah I also think 250 or so will do. Can be even 240 but 300 would be optimal

[xev]

i would say 200-250 sweet spot.

please make this suggestion happen.

i was going to make it myself, but ralsei beat me to it.

[Steev]

+1 for sure, 250 fps cap seems good, can't wait to see mike decline it

[howl]

+1, for those who play on 144-240hz monitors, and they're unable to uncap their FPS above that refresh rate.

[M.8.N_]

+1 if we can't remove fps limit to128, then just make it to 250. Fair enough.

[Combean0007]

they gonna swim faster than me!1111  😔

[Ast]

whatthehell, wait sec, if they raise fps to 250 it could be swimming faster or wat