2
I am commenting here as Akeno have ask for my thought on the matter. After carefully reading the denial reason Dani has given, It makes no sense to me cause the I am pretty sure that in the highlighted rule “You may kill them if they are in a group” says that you may kill them if they are playing together at the moment of your encounter with them (if they are close to eachother in different car or in same car) and not just kill any random member of their group even if they are not close.
As per my understanding what dani said in the report explains that if A person was attacked by B person, then he is also allowed to kill B’s group member C,D,E regardless of their contribution or their distance from B. Another explanation: suppose me and Akeno are in one group, and he attacked/killed Dani, then dani is eligible to kill me as well if he sees me near him buying ammo or casually roaming around just because I am in his group.
In the proofs provided by Akeno, it was very clear that xolonium wasn’t protecting anyone but killed him considering he had a valid revenge. Now I might be wrong because I can’t tell if he really had a reason to kill him or not but, I don’t think its the actual meaning of group rule what dani have posted in the report