1
General / Community Transparency - Overdoz
« on: January 20, 2024, 09:27:46 pm »
I would just like to address an issue that has been lingering around within the community for the past couple of days in regards to a recent promotion within the staff team.
The particular player formally went by the name Overdoz , and if you know who they are I need not to explain it any further.
However I do need to explain my actions, and how these came to the situation where I currently stand.
I am the kind of person where I always believe it's always worthwhile giving someone a chance in an opportunity they would otherwise never have, regardless of their past however I know the community backlash can come about pretty quickly.
I was happy with the outcome I seen from this individual as a tester, going above and beyond with the current tester team to test reported bugs / features not working properly.
After multiple months had passed, and being fully aware of who he is I wanted to give him the chance at further responsibilities putting him on a probationary period as a moderator.
The community feedback received however far outweighs the reasoning to keep him on as a moderator so effective immediately their assistance as a moderator is no longer required.
Further discussions will be had on whether he will retain a position within the team whether it be as a tester or helper but that discussion is yet to have any outcome.
If you have any questions I will answer them transparently here, unless you specifically DM me.
I will update you all with more clarity once we determine an outcome -.
The particular player formally went by the name Overdoz , and if you know who they are I need not to explain it any further.
However I do need to explain my actions, and how these came to the situation where I currently stand.
I am the kind of person where I always believe it's always worthwhile giving someone a chance in an opportunity they would otherwise never have, regardless of their past however I know the community backlash can come about pretty quickly.
I was happy with the outcome I seen from this individual as a tester, going above and beyond with the current tester team to test reported bugs / features not working properly.
After multiple months had passed, and being fully aware of who he is I wanted to give him the chance at further responsibilities putting him on a probationary period as a moderator.
The community feedback received however far outweighs the reasoning to keep him on as a moderator so effective immediately their assistance as a moderator is no longer required.
Further discussions will be had on whether he will retain a position within the team whether it be as a tester or helper but that discussion is yet to have any outcome.
If you have any questions I will answer them transparently here, unless you specifically DM me.
I will update you all with more clarity once we determine an outcome -.