Author Topic: Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation  (Read 447 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rated 3 times

Online Ardealul

  • *
  • Posts: 685
  • Country: 00
  • Respect: +19/-11
  • Gender: Male
  • [color=white]Why can't we use colors here[/color]
    • View Profile
  • MCNR name: Ardealul
  • Discord name: arduel
Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation
« on: October 04, 2023, 12:33:00 pm »
« Last Rated on: October 05, 2023, 03:44:05 am »
Richman castles are available for sale at prices ranging from 20-60 million, but there is a capped selling price of 10-11 million.

You have two options when selling one:
a) take the risk of getting scammed
b) take the risk of losing the sale until you can talk to a staff member to moderate the transaction

The 10 million cap price is suitable for most properties, but certain ones, such as castles, farms, or those with rare exterior/interior features, should have their caps updated to higher values.

This adjustment will encourage people to sell these exceptional properties instead of keeping them indefinitely.

Sorry for so much bold, i am checking if this way it's easier to understand, i want feedback of this :D

Offline Ralsei

  • Weirdest Femboy 2022
  • *
  • Posts: 1102
  • Country: se
  • Respect: +32/-166
  • Gender: Female
  • герой
    • View Profile
  • MCNR name: Ralsei
  • Discord name: ralsiel
Re: Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2023, 12:38:21 pm »
This should've been added 2 centures ago but mike thinks "Cap will be so people won't sell for retarded price"

Online Ardealul

  • *
  • Posts: 685
  • Country: 00
  • Respect: +19/-11
  • Gender: Male
  • [color=white]Why can't we use colors here[/color]
    • View Profile
  • MCNR name: Ardealul
  • Discord name: arduel
Re: Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2023, 12:44:19 pm »
This should've been added 2 centures ago but mike thinks "Cap will be so people won't sell for retarded price"
The cap is suitable for most properties, ensuring that money retains its value. However, in my opinion, certain properties should have a higher cap, perhaps around 60 million for Richman castles. This adjustment would encourage property owners to consider selling them instead of holding onto them indefinitely. Otherwise, potential buyers are left waiting for property owners to be banned, allowing them to acquire those juicy Richman castles after a month.

Offline Ravager

  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 542
  • Country: ps
  • Respect: +7/-86
  • Gender: Male
  • fastest man alive
    • View Profile
Re: Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2023, 04:14:37 pm »
;(

Offline PlopZero

  • *
  • Posts: 118
  • Country: 00
  • Respect: +2/-5
  • Buster
    • View Profile
  • MCNR name: PlopZero
  • Crew: [ O ]
Re: Balancing Property Sales: Pricing Caps and Risk Mitigation
« Reply #4 on: October 05, 2023, 03:43:39 am »
In my opinion, houses are usually bought because someone genuinely likes the property or thinks they can sell it for more, either way it is their choice, and is what make the game fun (you taking risks and choices). Hardly anyone gets manipulated to buying something they don’t want, and putting limits won’t do much if anybody is worried about manipulation. People will regret purchasing something (whether they lose 50k in the purchase or 500k, or 1M), but that’s normal.

That said, economy is changing, and in the case where someone really wants a house they will rather overpay than hear not selling, so I think there should be no limit at all.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2023, 04:47:24 am by PlopZero »